Related
Despite the perceived repute , no writing style is better than horror at making sequels . repugnance movies have a unique power not only to approach attentive construct with deep emotional and visual catharsis , but also extend on those construct in well - executed follow - up entries . The horror continuation landscape is rich terrain , made up of as many out of sight gems as it is high - profile classics . Granted , not all horror subsequence are created adequate ( for everyBride of FrankensteinorBlade IIthere are about a thousandBlair enchantress 2 ’s ) , but many of the genre ’s most frail sequels still manage to find some magic in all the terror and gore .
repulsion ’s power to severalize efficient history by arouse powerful emotional responses may always be underestimated , as will its unparalleled track record of innovation in almost every technical discipline of filmmaking . Somecult - revulsion favoritesare underestimated by mainstream audience , while the merits of others go leave out even by die - hard repulsion devotee . Horror ’s fertile tradition of revisit stories from a sassy new perspective permeates every recession of the genre . No matter where you are in the world of repugnance , a in secret awe-inspiring sequel is potential a stone ’s befuddle away . Here are17 on the QT Awesome Horror Sequelsto wet your appetite for olympian cinematic scourge .
Psycho 2
Anyone honest-to-goodness enough to have rented moving picture at Blockbuster plausibly remembers seeing the cover ofPsycho II , III , orIVon a ledge next to Hitchcock ’s original chef-d’oeuvre and rolling their eyes in low-down holy terror . How could anyone even think of making a sequel toPsycho , permit alone three ? ! And how could any of those sequels possibly be worth watching ? ! ThePsychosequels may not be for everyone , but they do offer some challenging takes on the privileged working of Norman Bates ( who is played by Anthony Perkins in every movie , thankfully ) .
psychotic IIis a peculiarly worthwhile entry . Anthony Perkins ’ first return performance as Norman Bates — however wooden at times — is quite in force within the 20 - geezerhood - later premise . Visually , it strikes a crafty balance of hearkening back to the iconic visuals of the first film and creating its own unique atmosphere . Psycho IImay never give the horrific tiptop of Hitchcock ’s original , but it does support on its own two foot .
The Fly II
This 1989 subsequence to David Cronenberg ’s chef-d’oeuvre of organic structure horror is not a particularly great movie . For the most part , it ’s not even a very good one . But the inventive work of Chris Walas , the creature effect mastermind of the first film and director of the sequel , deserves all the praise in the man .
The Fly II ’s premiss is a bit convolute and cockamamie – featuring the son of Seth Brundle ( Jeff Goldblum ’s character from the first flick ) slow morph into another “ Brundlefly ” under the control of a pot that need to use his father ’s " telepod " engineering for profit — but the special issue , along with the motion-picture show ’s exciting third bit , makeThe Fly IIa secretly awesome horror movie . Brundlefly 2.0 is a monstrously electrifying universe , as are the other deform telepod demon feature throughout the film . For today ’s CGI - berate cinema - goers , the ingenious practical outcome ofThe Fly II ’s caliber will always be a rare , rare delicacy .
A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge
The firstNightmare on Elm St.sequel is scarcely the horror franchise ’s bright here and now , but it deserve to be remembered for its incessantly discussable gay subtext . The picture ’s game is often criticized for its deviation from the serial publication ’ well - prove dream system of logic , choose or else for a patch that involves protagonist teen Jesse Walsh ( Mark Patton ) tardily being possessed by Freddy so the killer janitor can terrorize the tangible creation . Jesse ’s ownership by Freddy has been frequently explored as a metaphor for the protagonist ’s W.C. queerness — a version backed up by multiple scenes in the movie , including an meeting with a gymnasium teacher at a gay bar and a subtly homoerotic interaction with a male ally in his chamber .
The mere fact that the independent type is manly evokes homoerotic themes , as the character would almost certainly go to a “ final girl ” in most other horror movies . Like it ’s homoerotic undertones , Freddy ’s Revengedemands to be remembered as a on the Q.T. awesome entity .
Rob Zombie’s Halloween II
It ’s not necessarily better than the originalHalloween II , but Rob Zombie ’s 2009 sequel / remake explores psychological dominion that has n’t really been explored by a slasher film before or since . Zombie ’s second outing with the franchise takes an unflinching look at the cruel aftermath ofMichael Myers ’ rampage in the first picture show . His hold up victims — Michael ’s sister Laurie , Sheriff Lee Brackett , and Lee ’s daughter Annie — get themselves all living together in a feeble attempt at some semblance of a normal life after their experience , but the emotional trauma is every turn a stumbling mental block as Michael ’s brutal take .
No one knows how to subject an audience to realistic terror in a surreal setting quite like Rob Zombie , andHalloween IIdelivers relentless prospect that carry a shockingly sobering emotional weight .
Halloween III: Season of the Witch
The third entry in the mother of all slasher series ’ is often drop because it ’s the only Halloween movie that does n’t pore on franchise antagonist Michael Myers , butHalloween III : time of year of the Witch’sclear tale break from the rest of the series is the very matter that make it secretly awesome .
Not only doesHalloween IIIleave Michael Myers out of the picture , it single out itself from the slasher genre entirely , instead extend a supernatural sci - fi secret plan that dive deep into the mythology around the holiday from which the serial go its name . Tom Atkins turn in one of many legendary b - horror performances as a doctor who stumbles upon a strange mass execution plot involving androids and witchery . Yes , it ’s every bite as insane as it sound , butHalloween III ’s campy story proves to be quite the provocative treat .
Friday the 13th Part II
Before Jason set up the ice hockey mask , he roamed the woods in a gunny sackful … and believe it or not , he still front terrifying . Friday the thirteenth Part IIis stuck in a weird billet — just after the original film , where ( pamperer warning signal ) he terminate up not being the central antagonist at all , and before he put on the ice hockey mask and became the most visually iconic slasher villain of all time .
luckily , Part IIencapsulates everything fans have come to have intercourse about the summer - camp revulsion series ( a helpless cast of characters of steamy juvenility , relentlessly drawn out foot - chase , unrelenting last after brutal destruction ) , all without the visual boost of the iconic masquerade . The greatest thing abouttheFridayseriesis that there ’s something to enjoy in reasonably much every movie ( including the more idiotic entry likePart VIII : Jason Takes ManhattanorJason X ) , but nothing beats the simplicity ofPart II .
Omen III: The Final Conflict
As far as demonic small fry repugnance movies go , The Omenisn’t among the greatest ( The Bad Seed , The exorciser ) but it ’s also far from the worst ( Children of the Cornand its sequels ) . Its verbatim follow - up , Damien : Omen II , is little more than a rehash of the original . Omen III : The Final Conflict , on the other hand , comes at the son - of - satan premise from a terrifyingly different slant — casting the always excellent Sam Neill as an grownup Damien in U.S. political sympathies , attempt to obturate the second coming of Christ .
The Final Conflictis really just an OK moving picture . It has a few optic high points that capture the creepy spiritual atmosphere of the first Omen , but Neill ’s unrelentingly ominous breakout performance is the affair that really makes it worth watch out .
Dr. Phibes Rises Again
Any artwork director will tell you thatThe Abominable Dr. Phibesis an art director ’s movie , and its Egypt - themed , equally campy sequel is no different . Dr. Phibes rise up Againis an ultra - stylised horror caper featuring Vincent Price in the twilight of his career , but undoubtedly no bad for wearing . In bothDr . Phibesfilms , Price is intelligibly having a majuscule metre overact it up as the titular antagonist ( a deform prof who comes back from the dead to exact retaliation on the doctors who could n’t save his wife from a deadly car crash ) , and the subsequence ’s Egyptian turn on the first film ’s output design is worth the watch alone .
Dr. Phibes Rises Againwill in all probability get the all - stylus - no - means label from some viewers , but in the end , the style of the film — a glorious early ' 70s arthouse combination of Egyptian imagery and nontextual matter art deco ingroup — is the inwardness .
Child’s Play 2
reckon up “ self - parody ” in the dictionary and you ’ll ascertain a picture of all theChild ’s Playmovies fromBride of Chuckyonward . The posterior sequel in the series are the ones that most hoi polloi remember , so it ’s well-situated to forget that there ’s a drastic tonic shift right in the middle .
Child ’s Play 2is really the only film in the serial publication to in full exploit the premise without adventure into self - lampoon territory . The first moving picture is a valorous effort , but it never quite make out to strike the right balance between comedy and horror for the Chucky character . Child ’s act 2intuitively sleep together how and when to make the fiber funny and/or terrifying , and it order a account that ’s big enough for its preposterous premise without beingtoobig .
Son of Frankenstein
It ’s apprehensible thatSon of Frankensteinis the most neglect sequel to Universal ’s 1931 monster classic . It issue forth right afterBride of Frankenstein — arguably the proficient of Universal ’s other giant pictures and one of the greatest sequel ever made . It ’s also cover in obscureness by later , loud mash - ups likeHouse of DraculaorAbbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein .
ButSon of Frankensteinhas its own classic Hollywood vibration and comedic appealingness that should n’t go un - delight . The movie put Boris Karloff in his final visual aspect as the Monster , along with Basil Rathbone as the titular son of the original Baron von Frankenstein and Bela Lugosi as Ygor . The sequel is most famed for introducing many of theFrankenstein ’s most famous pop - culture staple fibre ( such as the hunchback brother being name Ygor , and the wooden - fortify constable that would be splendidly parodied in Mel Brooks’Young Frankenstein ) , making for a fun , light - hearted coda to cinema ’s fine one - two punch of classic repugnance .
