How doesSolo : A Star Wars Storycompare toRogue One ?   As the first twoStar Warsspin - offs , audiences will inevitably size these movies up side by side . Conceptually , these two films are the first Star Wars spinoff movie , a whole new character of adventure set in the beloved Galaxy Far , Far Away . Rogue Oneexplored an untold chapter in Star Wars history , revealing the hero who made Luke ’s Death Star   run possible;Solo , in contrast , has finally give away the dead on target backstory of the galaxy ’s preferent scoundrel , Han Solo .

There ’s a sense in whichSolo : A Star Wars Storyis blaspheme by the winner ofRogue One . That moving picture broke $ 1 billion at the global box office , cement the idea that a successful Star Wars movie should recrudesce one billion . No studio was ever go to be able-bodied to hold up up to that , but woefully this singular success makesSolo ’s initial box office performance all the more distressingly noticeable . Solohas currently   deliveredan estimated $ 83.3 million opening weekendagainstRogue One ’s $ 155 million . Given the sheer scale ofSolo ’s reshoots , it ’s actually potential the film ’s box office wo n’t withhold its costs .

But compare betweenRogue OneandSolohave the potential to be far more instructive than just toss away out figures from the box office . These two Star Wars spinoffs take a subtly different approach , and as a upshot they give veridical insight into just what sort ofStar Warsstory has the potential to perform well . Meanwhile , both productions were actually remarkably troubled - but in the case ofRogue One , fresh marketing forestall tales of the reshoots dominating the conversation . Let ’s take a look at how these two films compare .

Sidious, Tyranus, Maul, and Vader.

Comparing the Concepts of Rogue One and Solo

Let ’s bulge out with the gamy - stratum concepts . When Disney purchased Lucasfilm back in 2012 , the House of Mouse had to make a difficult determination ; would they retain the oldStar WarsExpanded Universe , with its complex web of persistence , or would they erase it ? Disney chose the later , reducing the prescribed canon down to the already - extant cinema and animated shows . Rogue OneandSoloboth exemplify the wiseness of this decision ; both are essentially crowing - screen interpretation of   concepts the EU had   explore   a foresighted time ago .

But that ’s not to say the high - point conception are the same . Rogue Onedirector Gareth Edwards pitched   the film to Lucasfilm as a Vietnam War moving-picture show . He literally photoshopped maverick helmets on the tops of photos from conflicts in the Middle East and World War II , and used those as part of his pitch shot to the studio . Edwards be intimate that George Lucas had been shape by the Vietnam War back when he first create Star Wars , and this film was an attack to return to those roots . It gaveRogue Onea unequalled style , and cause the motion picture to cease in a bittersweet fashion , with the demise of the protagonists .   The first Rogues   had triumphed , but at a terrible cost .

Related:Solo Reuses Footage From Rogue One’s Marketing

In direct contrast , Solo ’s in high spirits - level pitch is a simple one ; it ’s Han Solo ’s origin story . Lucasfilm may have beenproud of Kasdan ’s script , but it runs through   this backstory like a checklist . Given the film focus most of it ’s runtime on just a few days , it press all the major events in Han ’s life into a outstandingly scant menstruum of clock time . Within ( what seems like ) less than a workweek , Han has become a smuggler , won the Falcon from Lando , earned a co-pilot in Chewie , and even pulled off the Kessel Run . The stylistic overtones of a heist flick logically flow from the plot , rather than the themes and ideas dictating it as in the character ofRogue One .

Both of these cinema are essentially digressive to the Original Trilogy . In the strictest sense , neither is actually " necessary"in ordination to make sense of the main Star Wars Saga ; while they subtly re-explain some scenes from Lucas ’s original films , it ’s all done so cautiously and reverentially . As a result , both moving-picture show had to vindicate their universe in order of magnitude to win . They both pull it off - butSolo ’s weaker marketing think audiences did n’t actuallyknowthe film force it off beforehand .

The Troubled Productions of the Star Wars Spinoffs

inquisitively enough , bothRogue OneandSolohad significant behind - the - scenes production emergence . In May 2016 , there were reports that Lucasfilm was unhappy with Gareth Edwards ’s cut ofRogue One , with discussion ofextensive reshoots- including claim that up to 40 % of the celluloid would require to be reworked . Tony Gilroy , who wasbrought in to write the reshoots , recently yield a sense of the behind - the - scenes problem . " They were in such a swampland , " he explained . " They were in so much terrible , terrible trouble that all you could do was improve their position . " Gilroy reworked the intact narrative , spot that the script had turn a loss its sozzled focal point . The termination was compressed , explaining why a lot of footage from the trailer was n’t in the net stinger , and Gilroy insisted that the heroes should really give way . " It ’s a picture show about sacrifice , " he explained , and that mean there had to be sacrifice .

The scale of these changes was mostly observe under wraps until the moving-picture show ’s release . Then it became obvious becauseentire sequence from the trailers were missing .   Jyn confront down a TIE Fighter , flashback succession boast a younger Saw Gerrera , and of trend Jyn ’s " I rebel " delivery . The Internet fleetly became spell-bound with discuss the reshoots , but there ’s a horse sense in which it did n’t matter ; they had n’t really dominated the on-line narration until after the flick ’s spillage , meaning their wallop on the film ’s repute was muted .

Related:Solo: A Star Wars Story Reshoots: What’s Lord & Miller And What’s Ron Howard?

Solo ’s issues were even more hard , and became the movie ’s main talk spot . The annunciation ofSolohad been greet with more than a little skepticism , but Lucasfilm had dealt with that by earn a surprising choice as to the film ’s theater director ; they pick out Phil Lord and Chris Miller . Unfortunately , deep in the twenty-four hours the " creative differences " between Lord and Miller and Lucasfilm became irreconcilable . The directors were go off , and a thousand rumors swirled online as to the understanding . Lucasfilm hired Ron Howard , a " dependable duo of hands , " to fix the film ; he reportedlyreshot nearly all of it , at almost twice the budget . Where the scale ofRogue One ’s yield issues had been kept mostly under wrap , Solo ’s were public noesis , damage the film ’s report before the merchandising drive had even start to kick into gear . That meant selling forSolowas always be a foxy proposition .

Page 2 of 2:The Marketing and Critical Response to the Star Wars Spinoffs

The Marketing for Solo and Rogue One

Rogue Onewasthe most anticipated movie of 2016 , in big part because it was ride the crest of Disney ’s reinvigorated Star Wars brand . The enfranchisement was sweet and new , and the thought of a Star Wars spinoff was unheard of . Lucasfilm   releasedthe first trailerin April 2016 , but dial back on the marketing until about eight weeks before the film ’s discharge . The studio conjoin force play with five world brands - Nissan ,   Duracell , General Mills , Gillette and Verizon - to partner on an all-encompassing promotional run . The most impressive part of this was Verizon’sRogue One 360 Experience , which placed users in the cockpit of a Rebel starfighter .

ButSolowas released against a very unlike context . The merchandising of mod blockbusters tend to kick back off six or seven month before release , and by the end of 2017 viewers were enquire just where theSolotrailer was . The problem for Lucasfilm was thatSolowas secrete too soon afterStar Wars : The Last Jedi , and the studio did n’t really want to be advertize two films at once . As a resultant , thefirst trailerforSolowasn’t in reality release until the Super - Bowl Weekend in February , just three months beforeSolowould hit theater . A strong TV hunting expedition last kicked off in April , bear out by some creative fresh coming such asa video - tour of the Falcon(hosted by Donald Glover ) andanother 360 degree experienceset around Han and Lando ’s game of Sabacc . This time around , promotional partners include Nissan , Snapchat , Google , Esurance , Norton , and Solo Cups . Solopremiered at Cannes in an attempt to repel conversation that was n’t particularly successful .

Related:Solo: A Star Wars Story’s Director Problems - What Really Happened

In hypothesis , Solo ’s marketing should have worked . In realness , the cinema was releasing too soon after the last Star Wars movie , and Lucasfilm ’s reluctance to market two films at once meant things kicked off far too late . Making matters worse , the departure of Lord and Miller had already turn public opinion onSolo , and marketing had   launched too late to enchant viewer ' attention .

The Critical Reaction to the Spinoffs

Critical response toRogue Oneleft Lucasfilm delighted . The cinema settle at 85 % on the Tomatometer , give it a score on Rotten Tomatoes that ’s actually mellow thanReturn of the Jedi . Star Felicity Jones received particular praise , as did K-2SO . Inour revaluation , we describedRogue Oneas " a rouse sci - fi   drama packed with thrill action at law set - pieces , charming   theatrical role , and fun nods for   viewers at   all levels of   Star Wars   fandom . " critic and viewers likewise were enthralled by the movie ’s " shades of gray " morals , which explore some of the darker ideas of what it intend to be a Rebel in the Star Wars galaxy . While the plastic film was hardly viewed as perfect , it was genuinely seen as add something of marvelous value to the Star Wars Saga .

Solomay not have performed well in term of the box spot , but critics have actually been fairly confident about the motion-picture show . It presently sit at 70 % on the Tomatometer , which is sure enough nothing to be ashamed of . It ’s been praised as a fun - albeit rather bland - prequel movie . WhileSolowas praised for being the most intimate Star Wars movie to date , it just was n’t seen as a jeopardy - taker . Most fit that Alden   Ehrenreich performed well as the titular hero , but in truthSolojust did n’t succeed the critics over in the wayRogue Onedid .

The line between the vital responses essentially orbit around the word " risk . “Rogue Oneactually dared to take risks in the Star Wars galaxy , telling a different sort of tale to the ones viewers have seen before . In direct contrast , Ron Howard ’s dextrous reshoots removed all signified of risk fromSolo(assuming it was there previously ) , result in a film that ’s perfectly acceptable - but frankly fairly generic .

Din Djarin and Ahsoka-1

-

Ultimately , the sad true statement is that the equivalence betweenRogue OneandSolois between one film that succeeded beyond Lucasfilm ’s wildest Hope - and another that has sadly underperformed . Looking back , though , comparing these two film offers instructive deterrent example as to just whySolois scramble . AsRogue Oneproved , trouble during product can be whelm , and reshoots do n’t need to be a problem for a film . What you need , in orderliness to make a success of even a Star Wars movie , is both a strong central concept and a sure-footed selling push .

More:Solo Makes Star Wars: The Last Jedi Look Even Better

George Lucas with A New Hope imagery v3

Han Solo Movie and Rogue One

Felicity Jones Jyn Erso Rogue One disguise

Ron Howard Replace Lord and Miller Star Wars Han Solo

Han Solo on the Millennium Falcon with Rogue One

/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Alden-Ehrenreich-Han-Solo-Star-Wars-Story-e1527264947316.jpg

Movies

Star Wars